Which of the following is a step followed by WHRW when a sexual harassment victim comes forward?

When a sexual harassment victim comes forward, WHRW follows a protocol that prioritizes the welfare of the victim and ensures a thorough response to the situation. Documenting the incident and consulting authorities is essential for several reasons. First, it establishes a clear record of what has occurred, which is crucial for any investigations or potential legal actions that may follow. This documentation can protect both the victim and the station, providing a basis for understanding the context of the complaint.

Additionally, consulting authorities ensures that appropriate measures are taken to address the situation. This can involve involving relevant personnel within the station who are trained to handle such sensitive matters, as well as potentially law enforcement or legal counsel, depending on the severity of the allegations. This step is vital in ensuring that actions taken are compliant with legal and institutional policies regarding harassment, thereby promoting a safe environment for all individuals involved.

In contrast, other options suggest approaches that may not align with formal procedures or best practices for handling such sensitive situations. For example, providing public records of harassment would not protect the privacy of the victim and could further stigmatize them. Removing the alleged perpetrator without due process might violate workplace policies and rights. Allowing the alleged perpetrator to continue broadcasting could jeopardize the victim's safety and